Compare / head-to-head

Magistral Small 1.2vsMuse Spark 1.3

Magistral Small 1.2 and Muse Spark 1.3 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Muse Spark 1.3
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Mistral AI · Meta
Magistral Small 1.2
Mistral AI · released 2025-09-17
textvision
Context
128K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
4 · 3 core
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · released 2026-09-02
textvisionvideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
29 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkMagistral Small 1.2Muse Spark 1.3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only Magistral Small 1.2 reports · 4
GPQA Diamond70.07% ↗not reported——
AIME24 (pass@1)86.14% ↗not reported——
AIME25 (pass@1)77.34% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench (v5)70.88% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.3 reports · 29
LMArena Elonot reported1494.3 ↗——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported57.8% ↗——
AutomationBenchnot reported49.6% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported38% ↗epoch run——
DeepSearchQAnot reported90.3% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported75.4% ↗——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported46.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported74.4% ↗epoch run——
GDPval-AA v2not reported1754 ↗——
JobBenchnot reported64.9% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported64.1% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported81.1% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported79.6% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported78% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported82.8% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported95.9% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported89.7% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.04 ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1290.2 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1656.6 ↗——
MRCR 256K-512Knot reported98.5% ↗——
MRCR 512K-1Mnot reported98.1% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported25% ↗epoch run——
OSWorld 2.0 (partial)not reported66.9% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported99.2% ↗epoch run——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported81.8% ↗——
SWE-Atlas Codebase QnAnot reported59.4% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported88.8% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported24.7% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Magistral Small 1.2 minus Muse Spark 1.3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecMagistral Small 1.2Muse Spark 1.3Edge
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokensMuse Spark 1.3
Max output———
Input price / 1M—$1.25 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$4.25 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.15 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$5.5—
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoMuse Spark 1.3
Released2025-09-172026-09-02—
Cited benchmark scores429—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Magistral Small 1.2 vs …

More matchups

Muse Spark 1.3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Magistral Small 1.2 and Muse Spark 1.3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.