Compare / head-to-head

MiMo-V2.6-FlashvsMuse Spark 1.1

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 split their 8 shared benchmarks evenly. Muse Spark 1.1 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 3
even split
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Muse Spark 1.1
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Xiaomi MiMo · Meta
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi MiMo · released 2026-09-21
textvisionaudiovideo
Context
1M
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
12 · 3 core
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta · released 2026-07-09
textvisionvideoaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
30 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark 1.1ΔEdge
Reported by both · 8
LMArena Elo1451.8 ↗1491.3 ↗-39.5Muse Spark 1.1
DeepSWE v1.167.9% ↗53.3% ↗+14.6 ptMiMo-V2.6-Flash
JobBench61.2% ↗54.7% ↗+6.5 ptMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Agent (LMArena)-0.0057 ↗-0.0488 ↗0Tie
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1247.5 ↗1281.1 ↗-33.6Muse Spark 1.1
OSWorld-Verified80.8% ↗80.8% ↗0Tie
SAGE (Vals AI)43.5% ↗45.6% ↗-2.1 ptMuse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench 2.187.6% ↗80% ↗+7.6 ptMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash reports · 4
Agents' Last Exam27.6% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench 1.0.652.3% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.028.8% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)24.2% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.1 reports · 22
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported31.8% ↗——
BabyVisionnot reported76.3% ↗——
CharXiv Reasoningnot reported88.4% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)not reported53.3% ↗——
Finance Agent v2not reported57.2% ↗——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)not reported62.1% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported58.5% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported77.2% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported72.5% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported69.6% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported74.3% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported87.1% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported87.7% ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1541.7 ↗——
MCP Atlasnot reported88.1% ↗——
OSWorld-Verified (XLANG)not reported80.7% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported57.8% ↗epoch run——
SWE-Bench Pronot reported61.5% ↗——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)not reported40.5% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verifiednot reported75.6% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported75.6% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported6520.48 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is MiMo-V2.6-Flash minus Muse Spark 1.1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark 1.1Edge
Context window1M tokens1.0M tokensMuse Spark 1.1
Max output———
Input price / 1M—$1.25 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$4.25 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.15 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$5.5—
Modalitiestext · vision · audio · videotext · vision · video · audioTie
Released2026-09-212026-07-09—
Cited benchmark scores1230—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs …

More matchups

Muse Spark 1.1 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.