Compare / head-to-head

Muse Spark 1.2vsMuse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 14 of 16 shared benchmarks. Both list the same combined token price. Both offer a 1.0M-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
2 – 14
Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Cheaper per token
Tie
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1.0M tokens
Providers
Meta
same provider
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · released 2026-08-05
textvisionvideoaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
23 · 5 core
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · released 2026-09-02
textvisionvideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
29 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Muse Spark 1.3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 16
LMArena Elo1493.5 ↗1494.3 ↗-0.8Muse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents (Mercor)36.4% ↗57.8% ↗-21.4 ptMuse Spark 1.3
DeepSWE v1.159.3% ↗75.4% ↗-16.1 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)57.6% ↗64.1% ↗-6.5 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)77.5% ↗81.1% ↗-3.6 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)76.5% ↗79.6% ↗-3.1 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)74.3% ↗78% ↗-3.7 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)78.6% ↗82.8% ↗-4.2 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)91.2% ↗95.9% ↗-4.7 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)90% ↗89.7% ↗+0.3 ptMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Agent (LMArena)-0.0327 ↗0.04 ↗-0.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1292.8 ↗1290.2 ↗+2.6Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1531.8 ↗1656.6 ↗-124.8Muse Spark 1.3
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)74.5% ↗81.8% ↗-7.3 ptMuse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench 2.182.9% ↗88.8% ↗-5.9 ptMuse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)6.1% ↗24.7% ↗-18.6 ptMuse Spark 1.3
Only Muse Spark 1.2 reports · 7
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)54.9% ↗not reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)12% ↗not reported——
MCP Atlas90.3% ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)47.7% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified60.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)75.9% ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)60.3% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.3 reports · 13
AutomationBenchnot reported49.6% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported38% ↗epoch run——
DeepSearchQAnot reported90.3% ↗——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported46.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported74.4% ↗epoch run——
GDPval-AA v2not reported1754 ↗——
JobBenchnot reported64.9% ↗——
MRCR 256K-512Knot reported98.5% ↗——
MRCR 512K-1Mnot reported98.1% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported25% ↗epoch run——
OSWorld 2.0 (partial)not reported66.9% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported99.2% ↗epoch run——
SWE-Atlas Codebase QnAnot reported59.4% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Muse Spark 1.2 minus Muse Spark 1.3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecMuse Spark 1.2Muse Spark 1.3Edge
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokensTie
Max output———
Input price / 1M$1.25 ↗$1.25 ↗Tie
Output price / 1M$4.25 ↗$4.25 ↗Tie
Cached input / 1M$0.15 ↗$0.15 ↗Tie
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$5.5$5.5Tie
Modalitiestext · vision · video · audiotext · vision · videoMuse Spark 1.2
Released2026-08-052026-09-02—
Cited benchmark scores2329—
Reliability

Meta status

All providers →
More matchups

Muse Spark 1.2 vs …

More matchups

Muse Spark 1.3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Spark 1.3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.