Compare / head-to-head

Muse Spark 1.3vsSeed1.6 Flash

Muse Spark 1.3 and Seed1.6 Flash do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Seed1.6 Flash is 14.7x cheaper per token. Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Seed1.6 Flash
14.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Muse Spark 1.3
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Meta · ByteDance Seed
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · released 2026-09-02
textvisionvideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
29 · 7 core
Seed1.6 Flash
ByteDance Seed
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
32K
Input /1M
$0.075 ↗
Output /1M
$0.3 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.015
Scores
0 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Seed1.6 FlashΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only Muse Spark 1.3 reports · 29
LMArena Elo1494.3 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)57.8% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench49.6% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)38% ↗epoch runnot reported——
DeepSearchQA90.3% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.175.4% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)46.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)74.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GDPval-AA v21754 ↗not reported——
JobBench64.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)64.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)81.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)79.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)78% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)82.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)95.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)89.7% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.04 ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1290.2 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1656.6 ↗not reported——
MRCR 256K-512K98.5% ↗not reported——
MRCR 512K-1M98.1% ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)25% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OSWorld 2.0 (partial)66.9% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)99.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)81.8% ↗not reported——
SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA59.4% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 2.188.8% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)24.7% ↗not reported——
Only Seed1.6 Flash reports · 0
Seed1.6 Flash reports nothing Muse Spark 1.3 does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Muse Spark 1.3 minus Seed1.6 Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecMuse Spark 1.3Seed1.6 FlashEdge
Context window1.0M tokens256K tokensMuse Spark 1.3
Max output—32K tokens—
Input price / 1M$1.25 ↗$0.075 ↗Seed1.6 Flash
Output price / 1M$4.25 ↗$0.3 ↗Seed1.6 Flash
Cached input / 1M$0.15 ↗$0.015 ↗Seed1.6 Flash
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$5.5$0.375Seed1.6 Flash
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · videoTie
Released2026-09-02——
Cited benchmark scores290—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Muse Spark 1.3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Muse Spark 1.3 and Seed1.6 Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.