ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Dola Seed 2.1 TurbovsGLM-5.3-Flash

Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo and GLM-5.3-Flash split their 2 shared benchmarks evenly. GLM-5.3-Flash is 4.6x cheaper per token. GLM-5.3-Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 1
even split
Cheaper per token
GLM-5.3-Flash
4.6x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GLM-5.3-Flash
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
ByteDance Seed · Z.ai
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance Seed · released 2026-07-13
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
Input /1M
$0.5
Output /1M
$2.5
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
26 · 2 core
GLM-5.3-Flash
Z.ai · released 2026-09-16
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.15
Output /1M
$0.5
Cached /1M
$0.03
Scores
19 · 6 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkDola Seed 2.1 TurboGLM-5.3-FlashΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
BabyVision62.9% 53.4% +9.5 ptDola Seed 2.1 Turbo
Terminal-Bench 2.167.6% 84.3% -16.7 ptGLM-5.3-Flash
Only Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo reports · 24
Agent Startup Bench54% not reported
BeyondAIME88% not reported
CharXiv-RQ82.5% not reported
CharXiv-RQ (with tools)83.6% not reported
ERQA71.3% not reported
KINA46.6% not reported
MathVision90.1% not reported
MathVision (with tools)92.7% not reported
Minerva Video Reasoning65.9% not reported
MMLongBench 128K76.9% not reported
MMMU-Pro80.1% not reported
MMMU-Pro (with tools)82.2% not reported
NL2Repo-Bench43.7% not reported
OVOBench79.2% not reported
SuperGPQA67.4% not reported
SWE-Atlas30.6% not reported
TOMATO56.8% not reported
VideoMME89% not reported
VideoSimpleQA71.4% not reported
Workspace Bench54.7% not reported
WorldVQA48.6% not reported
xDailyBench56.4% not reported
ZEROBench11% not reported
ZEROBench (with tools)20% not reported
Only GLM-5.3-Flash reports · 17
GPQA Diamondnot reported90.2% epoch
LMArena Elonot reported1471.9
Agents' Last Exam (ALE-CLI)not reported26.3%
AutomationBench v1.0.6not reported48.8%
Chartography (with tools)not reported78%
CharXiv Reasoning (with tools)not reported89.4%
DeepSWE v1.1not reported63.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported17.1% epoch
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported55.8% epoch
GDPval-AA v2not reported1773
HLE (with tools)not reported55.3%
MMVUnot reported80.5%
MVBenchnot reported77.8%
NL2Reponot reported56.3%
OfficeQA Pronot reported62.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported93.9% epoch
Toolathlon Verifiednot reported78.4%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo minus GLM-5.3-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecDola Seed 2.1 TurboGLM-5.3-FlashEdge
Context window256K tokens1M tokensGLM-5.3-Flash
Max output131K tokens
Input price / 1M$0.5 $0.15 GLM-5.3-Flash
Output price / 1M$2.5 $0.5 GLM-5.3-Flash
Cached input / 1M$0.1 $0.03 GLM-5.3-Flash
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$3$0.65GLM-5.3-Flash
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · visionDola Seed 2.1 Turbo
Released2026-07-132026-09-16
Cited benchmark scores2619
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo vs …

More matchups

GLM-5.3-Flash vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo and GLM-5.3-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.