Compare / head-to-head

GLM-4.6VvsPhi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B

GLM-4.6V leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GLM-4.6V has the larger context window (128K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
GLM-4.6V leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GLM-4.6V
128K tokens
Providers
2 providers
Z.ai · Microsoft
GLM-4.6V
Z.ai · released 2025-12-08
textvisionvideo
Context
128K
Max out
32K
Input /1M
$0.3 ↗
Output /1M
$0.9 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.05
Scores
17 · 2 core
Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B
Microsoft · released 2026-03-04
textvision
Context
16K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
10 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15BΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
MMStar75.9% ↗64.5% ↗+11.4 ptGLM-4.6V
OCRBench86.5% ↗76% ↗+10.5 ptGLM-4.6V
Only GLM-4.6V reports · 15
LMArena Elo1378.7 ↗not reported——
AndroidWorld57% ↗not reported——
ChartQAPro65.5% ↗not reported——
CharXiv_Val-Reasoning63.2% ↗not reported——
Design2Code88.6% ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1161.5 ↗not reported——
MathVista85.2% ↗not reported——
MMBench V1.188.8% ↗not reported——
MMBrowseComp7.6% ↗not reported——
MMLongBench-Doc54.9% ↗not reported——
MMMU (Val)76% ↗not reported——
MMMU_Pro66% ↗not reported——
OSWorld37.2% ↗not reported——
VideoMMMU74.7% ↗not reported——
WebVoyager81% ↗not reported——
Only Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B reports · 8
AI2D_TESTnot reported84.8% ↗——
ChartQA_TESTnot reported83.3% ↗——
HallusionBenchnot reported64.4% ↗——
MathVerse_MINInot reported44.9% ↗——
MathVision_MINInot reported36.2% ↗——
MathVista_MINInot reported75.2% ↗——
MMMU_VALnot reported54.3% ↗——
ScreenSpot_v2not reported88.2% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.6V minus Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-4.6VPhi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15BEdge
Context window128K tokens16K tokensGLM-4.6V
Max output32K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.3 ↗——
Output price / 1M$0.9 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$0.05 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$1.2——
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · visionGLM-4.6V
Released2025-12-082026-03-04—
Cited benchmark scores1710—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.6V and Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.