Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 LunavsQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507

GPT-6 Luna leads 5 of 6 shared benchmarks. GPT-6 Luna is 4.2x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
5 – 1
GPT-6 Luna leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-6 Luna
4.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Luna
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.1 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
22 · 8 core
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-25
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.23 ↗
Output /1M
$2.3 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
23 · 10 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507ΔEdge
Reported by both · 6
GPQA Diamond90.5% ↗epoch run80.1% ↗epoch run+10.4 ptGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Elo1442.9 ↗1400 ↗+42.9GPT-6 Luna
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)31% ↗epoch run12% ↗epoch run+19 ptGPT-6 Luna
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)7% ↗epoch run9% ↗epoch run-2 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.9% ↗epoch run86.7% ↗epoch run+12.2 ptGPT-6 Luna
SimpleQA Verified41.4% ↗epoch run40.4% ↗epoch run+1 ptGPT-6 Luna
Only GPT-6 Luna reports · 16
APEX-Agents (Mercor)44.3% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.166.6% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)56.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)78.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)44.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)51.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)79% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)73.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)55.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)73.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)89.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)81.8% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0135 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1578.7 ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)13.6% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 reports · 17
MMLU-Pronot reported84.4% ↗——
AIME25not reported92.3% ↗——
Arena-Hard v2not reported79.7% ↗——
BFCL-v3not reported71.9% ↗——
GPQAnot reported81.1% ↗——
HLE (text-only)not reported18.2% ↗——
HMMT25not reported83.9% ↗——
IFEvalnot reported87.8% ↗——
LiveBench 20241125not reported78.4% ↗——
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)not reported74.1% ↗——
MMLU-Reduxnot reported93.8% ↗——
OJBenchnot reported32.5% ↗——
SuperGPQAnot reported64.9% ↗——
TAU2-Airlinenot reported58% ↗——
TAU2-Retailnot reported71.9% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported-11.34 ↗——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)not reported41% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Luna minus Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 LunaQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Edge
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokensGPT-6 Luna
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.1 ↗$0.23 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Output price / 1M$0.5 ↗$2.3 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Cached input / 1M$0.01 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.6$2.53GPT-6 Luna
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-6 Luna
Released2026-09-222025-07-25—
Cited benchmark scores2223—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Luna vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.