Compare / head-to-head
Hunyuan-A13B-Instructvs
MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1 leads 2 of 3 shared benchmarks. MiniMax M1 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 2
MiniMax M1 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
MiniMax M1
1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Tencent Hunyuan · MiniMax
Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct
Tencent Hunyuan · released 2025-06-27
text
- Context
- 262K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 15 · 3 core
MiniMax M1
MiniMax · released 2025-06-16
text
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 16 · 7 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 12 only Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct · 13 only MiniMax M1| Benchmark | Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct | MiniMax M1 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | 76.8% ↗ | 76.9% ↗ | -0.1 pt | MiniMax M1 |
| AIME 2024 | 87.3% ↗ | 86% ↗ | +1.3 pt | Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct |
| ZebraLogic | 84.7% ↗ | 86.8% ↗ | -2.1 pt | MiniMax M1 |
| Only Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct reports · 12 | ||||
| ArtifactsBench | 43% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BBH | 89.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BFCL v3 | 78.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| C3-Bench | 63.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ComplexFuncBench | 61.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Fullstackbench | 67.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GPQA-Diamond | 71.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IF-Eval | 84.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Livecodebench | 63.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MATH | 94.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OlympiadBench | 82.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| τ-Bench | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only MiniMax M1 reports · 13 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 56% ↗ | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 70% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 81.1% ↗ | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1363.9 ↗ | — | — |
| FullStackBench | not reported | 68.3% ↗ | — | — |
| HLE (no tools) | not reported | 8.4% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench (24/8~25/5) | not reported | 65% ↗ | — | — |
| LongBench-v2 | not reported | 61.5% ↗ | — | — |
| MATH-500 | not reported | 96.8% ↗ | — | — |
| OpenAI-MRCR (128k) | not reported | 73.4% ↗ | — | — |
| SimpleQA | not reported | 18.5% ↗ | — | — |
| TAU-bench (airline) | not reported | 62% ↗ | — | — |
| TAU-bench (retail) | not reported | 63.5% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct minus MiniMax M1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct | MiniMax M1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 262K tokens | 1M tokens | MiniMax M1 |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2025-06-27 | 2025-06-16 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 15 | 16 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Live from /statusMore matchups
Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
MiniMax M1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct and MiniMax M1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.